linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] include: linux: Reorganize timekeeping and ktime headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YYN78YlFrV0vFPq9@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Nov 2021 07:21:37 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@...edu>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] include: linux: Reorganize timekeeping and ktime
 headers

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 03:33:52PM -0400, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> Some time ago I sent a small patch to avoid implicit function declaration. 
> In particular, timekeeping.h was using ktime_to_ns(), a static function defined 
> in a header it does no include, ktime.h. Some maintainers saw this as an 
> opportunity to reorganize ktime, and so I did and tested for all architectures.
> Now, this patch has fallen into the "limbo of patches", so the original problem
> remains unsolved. Please, either take a look at this or check the original
> patch for the header dependencies.

Please just resend after 5.16-rc1 is out, there's nothing we can do with
this at this point in time.

thanks,

greg k-h