linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] bpf: Add selftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <98178f0f-ff43-b996-f78b-778f74b44a6b@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Nov 2021 14:32:37 +0800
From:   Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
To:     Joe Burton <jevburton.kernel@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Petar Penkov <ppenkov@...gle.com>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Joe Burton <jevburton@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] bpf: Add selftests

Hi,

On 11/2/2021 10:14 AM, Joe Burton wrote:
> From: Joe Burton <jevburton@...gle.com>
>
> Add selftests verifying that each supported map type is traced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Burton <jevburton@...gle.com>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_trace.c      | 166 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_map_trace.c       |  95 ++++++++++
>  .../bpf/progs/bpf_map_trace_common.h          |  12 ++
>  3 files changed, 273 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_trace.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_map_trace.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_map_trace_common.h
snip
> +	/*
> +	 * Invoke core BPF program.
> +	 */
> +	write_fd = open("/tmp/map_trace_test_file", O_CREAT | O_WRONLY);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(rc, 0, "open tmp file for writing"))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	bytes_written = write(write_fd, &write_buf, sizeof(write_buf));
> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(bytes_written, sizeof(write_buf), "write to tmp file"))
> +		return;
In fentry__x64_sys_write(), you just do trigger updates to maps, so for the
portability of the test
(e.g. run-able for arm64) and minimal dependency (e.g. don't depends on /tmp),
why do you
using nanosleep() and replacing fentry_x64_sys_write by
tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep instead.
Also it will be better if you can filter out other processes by pid.

Thanks,
Tao