linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND, v13 2/4] dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4c3036d8181c788fbf047883e2f49172edbe3f0f.camel@mediatek.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Nov 2021 17:52:36 +0800
From:   James Lo <james.lo@...iatek.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>,
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND, v13 2/4] dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the
 Mediatek SPMI controller

On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 08:06 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Nov 2021 16:10:19 +0800, James Lo wrote:
> > This adds documentation for the SPMI controller found on Mediatek
> > SoCs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml      | 76
> > +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
> > 
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m
> dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-
> review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-
> pmif.example.dt.yaml: spmi@...27000: reg: [[268595200, 3584],
> [268603392, 256]] is too long
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-
> review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-
> review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-
> pmif.example.dt.yaml: spmi@...27000: reg: [[268595200, 3584],
> [268603392, 256]] is too long
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-
> review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml
> 
> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> 
> See 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1550144__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yBdAIu8sF9FdGe9H9yO19pC0PvopKz_1DwYCmY0g5pqXvOC6acHZh_NfySMb2x_n$
>  
> 
> This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a
> patch
> series is generally the most recent rc1.
> 
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up
> to
> date:
> 
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> 
> Please check and re-submit.
> 

Dear Rob,

Due to [RESEND,v13,2/4] depends on [RESEND,v13,1/4],
so we local can pass yaml when apply all 4 patches,
and fail only apply [RESEND,v13,2/4] as your bot's result.

Should we merge [RESEND,v13,2/4] and [RESEND,v13,2/4] to one patch ?
Or Could your bot help to run yaml check for all 4 patches applied (one
series) ?


Many thanks