[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211104104727.GA3164@kadam>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:47:27 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: George Kennedy <george.kennedy@...cle.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: scsi_debug: fix return checks for kcalloc
This patch isn't right. It has no effect on run time.
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 02:01:42PM -0500, George Kennedy wrote:
> Change return checks from kcalloc() to now check for NULL and
> ZERO_SIZE_PTR using the ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR macro or the following
> crash can occur if ZERO_SIZE_PTR indicator is returned.
ZERO_SIZE_PTR is when you allocate a zero bytes successfully. It's
quite useful because you can do:
p = kmalloc(bytes, GFP_KERNEL);
for (i = 0; i < bytes; i++)
printk("%d\n", p[i]);
The for loop works. Zero bytes now like normal thing instead of needing
to be handled as a special case.
The IS_ERR_OR_NULL() check treats ZERO_SIZE_PTR as a valid pointer.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> index 40b473e..222e985 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> @@ -3909,7 +3909,7 @@ static int resp_comp_write(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
> return ret;
> dnum = 2 * num;
> arr = kcalloc(lb_size, dnum, GFP_ATOMIC);
> - if (NULL == arr) {
> + if (ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(arr)) {
kcalloc() only returns NULL on error. This check is Yoda code but
besides the style issue it's fine.
> mk_sense_buffer(scp, ILLEGAL_REQUEST, INSUFF_RES_ASC,
> INSUFF_RES_ASCQ);
> return check_condition_result;
> @@ -4265,7 +4265,7 @@ static int resp_verify(struct scsi_cmnd *scp, struct sdebug_dev_info *devip)
> return ret;
>
> arr = kcalloc(lb_size, vnum, GFP_ATOMIC);
> - if (!arr) {
The rest of these are correct. This patch doesn't fix a bug...
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists