[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211104120111.GB23122@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:01:11 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] tty/sysrq: Add alternative SysRq key
Hi!
> There exist machines which don't have SysRq key at all, e.g. chromebooks.
>
> This patch allows configuring an alternative key to act as SysRq. Devices
> which declare KEY_SYSRQ in their 'keybit' bitmap continue using KEY_SYSRQ,
> but other devices use the alternative SysRq key instead, by default F10.
> Which key is actually used can be modified with sysrq's module
> parameter.
Is F10 sensible default? Would it make sense to use something like
alt-shift-esc so that this can be enabled by default?
Best regards,
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists