[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYPrst2CUBXLYc9h@google.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 14:18:26 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Artem Kashkanov <artem.kashkanov@...el.com>,
Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] perf: Ensure perf_guest_cbs aren't reloaded
between !NULL check and deref
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021, Like Xu wrote:
> On 22/9/2021 8:05 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> > index 464917096e73..80ff050a7b55 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -6491,14 +6491,21 @@ struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *perf_guest_cbs;
> > int perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *cbs)
> > {
> > - perf_guest_cbs = cbs;
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(perf_guest_cbs))
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > +
> > + WRITE_ONCE(perf_guest_cbs, cbs);
>
> So per Paolo's comment [1], does it help to use
> smp_store_release(perf_guest_cbs, cbs)
> or
> rcu_assign_pointer(perf_guest_cbs, cbs)
> here?
Heh, if by "help" you mean "required to prevent bad things on weakly ordered
architectures", then yes, it helps :-) If I'm interpeting Paolo's suggestion
correctly, he's pointing out that oustanding stores to the function pointers in
@cbs need to complete before assigning a non-NULL pointer to perf_guest_cbs,
otherwise a perf event handler may see a valid pointer with half-baked callbacks.
I think smp_store_release() with a comment would be appropriate, assuming my
above interpretation is correct.
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/37afc465-c12f-01b9-f3b6-c2573e112d76@redhat.com/
>
> > return 0;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_register_guest_info_callbacks);
> > int perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *cbs)
> > {
> > - perf_guest_cbs = NULL;
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(perf_guest_cbs != cbs))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + WRITE_ONCE(perf_guest_cbs, NULL);
> > + synchronize_rcu();
> > return 0;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks);
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists