linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: separate the common code from machine driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YYP+l7tMofYoB+aC@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 4 Nov 2021 15:39:03 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     tiwai@...e.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, yc.hung@...iatek.com,
        daniel.baluta@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: separate the common code
 from machine driver

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 06:00:39PM +0800, Trevor Wu wrote:
> Because we will add DSP support, an new machine driver for the same
> board is required. BE and codec configuration will use the same code
> when machine driver is designed for the same board.

I don't follow why the DSP support requires a new driver?  Shouldn't all
systems with the DSP present be using it?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)