linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/16] 5.10.78-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Nov 2021 17:20:34 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, pavel@...x.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/16] 5.10.78-rc1 review

On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 09:53:57AM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On 11/4/21 8:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.78 release.
> > There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 06 Nov 2021 14:11:51 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.78-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Regressions detected.
> 
> Build failures on all architectures and all toolchains (GCC 8, 9, 10, 11; Clang 10, 11, 12, 13, nightly):
> - arc
> - arm (32-bits)
> - arm (64-bits)
> - i386
> - mips
> - parisc
> - ppc
> - riscv
> - s390
> - sh
> - sparc
> - x86
> 
> Failures look like this:
> 
>   In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/kernel.h:11,
>                    from /builds/linux/include/linux/list.h:9,
>                    from /builds/linux/include/linux/smp.h:12,
>                    from /builds/linux/include/linux/kernel_stat.h:5,
>                    from /builds/linux/mm/memory.c:42:
>   /builds/linux/mm/memory.c: In function 'finish_fault':
>   /builds/linux/mm/memory.c:3929:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'PageHasHWPoisoned'; did you mean 'PageHWPoison'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    3929 |  if (unlikely(PageHasHWPoisoned(page)))
>         |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   /builds/linux/include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
>      78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
>         |                                          ^
>   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> and this:
> 
>   /builds/linux/mm/memory.c:3929:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'PageHasHWPoisoned' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>           if (unlikely(PageHasHWPoisoned(page)))
>                        ^
> 
>   /builds/linux/mm/page_alloc.c:1237:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'ClearPageHasHWPoisoned' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>                           ClearPageHasHWPoisoned(page);
>                           ^
>   /builds/linux/mm/page_alloc.c:1237:4: note: did you mean 'ClearPageHWPoison'?
> 

What configuration?  This builds for me on x86 here on allmodconfig.

thanks,

greg k-h