linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] Introduce BPF map tracing capability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Nov 2021 10:11:31 -0700
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
CC:     Joe Burton <jevburton.kernel@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Petar Penkov <ppenkov@...gle.com>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Joe Burton <jevburton@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] Introduce BPF map tracing capability



On 11/4/21 9:14 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:23 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> wrote:
>>
>> asm("") indeed helped preserve the call.
>>
>> [$ ~/tmp2] cat t.c
>> int __attribute__((noinline)) foo() { asm(""); return 1; }
>> int bar() { return foo() + foo(); }
>> [$ ~/tmp2] clang -O2 -c t.c
>> [$ ~/tmp2] llvm-objdump -d t.o
>>
>> t.o:    file format elf64-x86-64
>>
>> Disassembly of section .text:
>>
>> 0000000000000000 <foo>:
>>          0: b8 01 00 00 00                movl    $1, %eax
>>          5: c3                            retq
>>          6: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 nopw    %cs:(%rax,%rax)
>>
>> 0000000000000010 <bar>:
>>         10: 50                            pushq   %rax
>>         11: e8 00 00 00 00                callq   0x16 <bar+0x6>
>>         16: e8 00 00 00 00                callq   0x1b <bar+0xb>
>>         1b: b8 02 00 00 00                movl    $2, %eax
>>         20: 59                            popq    %rcx
>>         21: c3                            retq
>> [$ ~/tmp2]
>>
>> Note with asm(""), foo() is called twice, but the compiler optimization
>> knows foo()'s return value is 1 so it did calculation at compiler time,
>> assign the 2 to %eax and returns.
> 
> Missed %eax=2 part...
> That means that asm("") is not enough.
> Maybe something like:
> int __attribute__((noinline)) foo()
> {
>    int ret = 0;
>    asm volatile("" : "=r"(var) : "0"(var));

asm volatile("" : "=r"(ret) : "0"(ret));

>    return ret;
> }

Right. We should prevent compilers from "inlining" return values.