[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYQegz3nPmbavQtK@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 10:55:15 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
dave.jiang@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
willy@...radead.org, jack@...e.cz, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] libnvdimm/pmem: Provide pmem_dax_clear_poison for
dax operation
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 05:31:32PM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
> +static int pmem_dax_clear_poison(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff,
> + size_t nr_pages)
> +{
> + unsigned int len = PFN_PHYS(nr_pages);
> + sector_t sector = PFN_PHYS(pgoff) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> + struct pmem_device *pmem = dax_get_private(dax_dev);
> + phys_addr_t pmem_off = sector * 512 + pmem->data_offset;
> + blk_status_t ret;
> +
> + if (!is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, sector, len))
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = pmem_clear_poison(pmem, pmem_off, len);
> + return (ret == BLK_STS_OK) ? 0 : -EIO;
No need for the braces here (and I'd prefer a good old if anyway).
Otherwise looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists