linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: correct cpu_missing reporting in mce_timed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Nov 2021 19:02:36 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:     Zhaolong Zhang <zhangzl2013@....com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: correct cpu_missing reporting in mce_timed_out

On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 03:47:36PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Frankly, we might just as well kill that cpu_missing thing because we
> > already say that some CPUs are not responding.
> 
> Yes. The more recent commit:
> 
> 7bb39313cd62 ("x86/mce: Make mce_timed_out() identify holdout CPUs")
> 
> tries to provide the more detailed message about *which* CPUs are missing

Exactly.

> I think cpu_missing can be dropped.

Zhaolong, you could send a patch doing that, instead.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette