[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211104195700.20724-1-luke.nowakowskikrijger@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 12:57:00 -0700
From: Luke Nowakowski-Krijger <luke.nowakowskikrijger@...onical.com>
To: shuah@...nel.org
Cc: keescook@...omium.org, luto@...capital.net, wad@...omium.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: Unconditionally define seccomp_metadata
There are conflicts between glibc system headers sys/ptrace.h and
linux/ptrace.h that can likely cause seccomp_metadata not be
defined depending on what version versions are installed, leading
to compile errors.
A solution to make this test more resitant to these system header
differences is to rely on defintions inside of the file by
unconditionally defining seccomp_metadata and removing the
linux/ptrace.h include where a defintion of seccomp_metadata
exists for certain headers.
Signed-off-by: Luke Nowakowski-Krijger <luke.nowakowskikrijger@...onical.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index d425688cf59c..67e2c3c001a0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/user.h>
#include <linux/prctl.h>
-#include <linux/ptrace.h>
#include <linux/seccomp.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
@@ -171,12 +170,12 @@ struct seccomp_data {
#ifndef PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_METADATA
#define PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_METADATA 0x420d
+#endif
struct seccomp_metadata {
__u64 filter_off; /* Input: which filter */
__u64 flags; /* Output: filter's flags */
};
-#endif
#ifndef SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER
#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER (1UL << 3)
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists