[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c07f121-42d3-9f37-1e14-842fb685b501@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 21:09:14 +0100
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@...labora.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>, Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
VMware Graphics <linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com>,
Zack Rusin <zackr@...are.com>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, spice-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm: Add a drm_drv_enabled() to check if drivers
should be enabled
Hello Jani,
On 11/4/21 20:57, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2021, Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com> wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * drm_drv_enabled - Checks if a DRM driver can be enabled
>> + * @driver: DRM driver to check
>> + *
>> + * Checks whether a DRM driver can be enabled or not. This may be the case
>> + * if the "nomodeset" kernel command line parameter is used.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
>> + */
>> +int drm_drv_enabled(const struct drm_driver *driver)
>> +{
>> + if (vgacon_text_force()) {
>> + DRM_INFO("%s driver is disabled\n", driver->name);
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_drv_enabled);
>
> The name implies a bool return, but it's not.
>
> if (drm_drv_enabled(...)) {
> /* surprise, it's disabled! */
> }
>
It used to return a bool in v2 but Thomas suggested an int instead to
have consistency on the errno code that was returned by the callers.
I should probably name that function differently to avoid confusion.
But I think you are correct and this change is caused too much churn
for not that much benefit, specially since is unclear that there might
be another condition to prevent a DRM driver to load besides nomodeset.
I'll just drop this patch and post only #2 but making drivers to test
using the drm_check_modeset() function (which doesn't have a name that
implies a bool return).
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists