lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 5 Nov 2021 07:04:39 +0100
From:   Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...e.de>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: fix crash on multiple early calls to
 add_bootloader_randomness()

Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:27:39AM +0100 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel:
> > > > -       if (unlikely(crng_init == 0)) {
> > > > +       /* We cannot do much with the input pool until it is set up in
> > > > +        * rand_initalize(); therefore just mix into the crng state.
> > > > +        * As this does not affect the input pool, we cannot credit
> > > > +        * entropy for this.
> > > > +        */
> > > > +       if (unlikely(crng_init == 0) || unlikely(crng_global_init_time == 0)) {
> > >
> > > Can we just drop the unlikely()s here?
> >
> > As that would be a different change to the one necessary to resolve the bug,
> > I'd like to defer that decision to the maintainer of random.c.
> >
> 
> In that case, can we at least using a single unlikely() for the whole condition?

Fixed for v3.

Thanks,
	Dominik

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ