[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQs5jCQ0kNKXWrTGEu45K+1mTGXWZrhgA3u8hv+yNfeSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:55:21 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] certs: remove noisy messages while generating the
signing key
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 4:34 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 4:59 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > When you run Kbuild with the parallel option -j, the messages from this
> > rule and others are interleaved, like follows:
> >
> > ###
> > CC arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.o
> > ### Now generating an X.509 key pair to be used for signing modules.
> > ###
> > ### If this takes a long time, you might wish to run rngd in the
> > ### background to keep the supply of entropy topped up. It
> > CC arch/x86/events/intel/bts.o
> > HDRTEST usr/include/linux/qnx4_fs.h
> > CC arch/x86/events/zhaoxin/core.o
> > ### needs to be run as root, and uses a hardware random
> > ### number generator if one is available.
> > AR init/built-in.a
> > ###
> >
> > On modern machines, it does not take a long time to generate the key.
> >
> > Remove the ugly log messages.
>
> I have no real objection to this, but I would still point out that
> the warning message may still be helpful for those building
> in a virtual machine or some other environment without a hwrng,
> and that most people wouldn't see the message anway if they
> built with 'make -s', at least after my 5d06ee20b662 ("modsign:
> hide openssl output in silent builds").
>
> I wonder if it would be time to change the default output to
> be more quiet, by degrading it one level, like
>
> old new
> only warnings make -s make
> CC file.o make make V=1
> full cmdline make V=1 make V=2
>
> This would take some time to adjust to, but it does sound like
> a more reasonable default. Does anyone still build without -s
> in practice?
Yes, me.
I usually build normally (CC file.o log style).
I am opposed to making silent builds default.
People would be upset if they do 'make' to
see nothing in the terminal.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists