lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQs5jCQ0kNKXWrTGEu45K+1mTGXWZrhgA3u8hv+yNfeSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:55:21 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] certs: remove noisy messages while generating the
 signing key

On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 4:34 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 4:59 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > When you run Kbuild with the parallel option -j, the messages from this
> > rule and others are interleaved, like follows:
> >
> >     ###
> >       CC      arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.o
> >     ### Now generating an X.509 key pair to be used for signing modules.
> >     ###
> >     ### If this takes a long time, you might wish to run rngd in the
> >     ### background to keep the supply of entropy topped up.  It
> >       CC      arch/x86/events/intel/bts.o
> >       HDRTEST usr/include/linux/qnx4_fs.h
> >       CC      arch/x86/events/zhaoxin/core.o
> >     ### needs to be run as root, and uses a hardware random
> >     ### number generator if one is available.
> >       AR      init/built-in.a
> >     ###
> >
> > On modern machines, it does not take a long time to generate the key.
> >
> > Remove the ugly log messages.
>
> I have no real objection to this, but I would still point out that
> the warning message may still be helpful for those building
> in a virtual machine or some other environment without a hwrng,
> and that most people wouldn't see the message anway if they
> built with 'make -s', at least after my 5d06ee20b662 ("modsign:
> hide openssl output in silent builds").
>
> I wonder if it would be time to change the default output to
> be more quiet, by degrading it one level, like
>
>                     old           new
> only warnings       make -s       make
> CC file.o           make          make V=1
> full cmdline        make V=1      make V=2
>
> This would take some time to adjust to, but it does sound like
> a more reasonable default. Does anyone still build without -s
> in practice?


Yes, me.

I usually build normally (CC file.o log style).

I am opposed to making silent builds default.

People would be upset if they do 'make' to
see nothing in the terminal.




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ