linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: drop cc-option fallbacks for architecture selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Nov 2021 09:12:44 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Antonio Terceiro <antonio.terceiro@...aro.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Klose <doko@...ian.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: drop cc-option fallbacks for architecture selection

On 2021-10-18 16:07:12 [+0200], Arnd Bergmann wrote:
…
> 
> This should be safe to apply on all stable kernels, and will be required
> in order to keep building them with gcc-11 and higher.

Could we get this applied, please?

Matthias Klose asked gcc-upstream if the change, causing the problem,
was expected/ intended. I don't think this matters given that the
provided fallback does not work.

Sebastian