[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211105093437.GB32036@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 09:34:37 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 09:32:08AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got conflicts in:
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
>
> between commit:
>
> cd9bc2c92588 ("arm64: Recover kretprobe modified return address in stacktrace")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 552e196d88e5 ("arm64: ftrace: use HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR")
>
> from the arm64 tree.
D'oh, having realised this conflict last week, I completely forgot about
it when queuing that fix from Mark. I'll just drop it and wait until -rc1.
Cheers,
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists