| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1636075800-3264-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 09:30:00 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, illusionist.neo@...il.com,
zlim.lnx@...il.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com,
luke.r.nels@...il.com, xi.wang@...il.com, bjorn@...nel.org,
iii@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
udknight@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6] bpf: Change value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33
In the current code, the actual max tail call count is 33 which is greater
than MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT (defined as 32), the actual limit is not consistent
with the meaning of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, there is some confusion and need to
spend some time to think about the reason at the first glance.
We can see the historical evolution from commit 04fd61ab36ec ("bpf: allow
bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs") and commit f9dabe016b63
("bpf: Undo off-by-one in interpreter tail call count limit").
In order to avoid changing existing behavior, the actual limit is 33 now,
this is reasonable.
After commit 874be05f525e ("bpf, tests: Add tail call test suite"), we can
see there exists failed testcase.
On all archs when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set:
# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf
# dmesg | grep -w FAIL
Tail call error path, max count reached jited:0 ret 34 != 33 FAIL
On some archs:
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf
# dmesg | grep -w FAIL
Tail call error path, max count reached jited:1 ret 34 != 33 FAIL
Although the above failed testcase has been fixed in commit 18935a72eb25
("bpf/tests: Fix error in tail call limit tests"), it is still necessary
to change the value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33 to make the code
more readable, then do some small changes of the related code.
The 32-bit x86 JIT was using a limit of 32, just fix the wrong comments and
limit to 33 tail calls as the constant MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT updated.
For the other implementations, no function changes, it does not change the
current limit 33, the new value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT can reflect the actual
max tail call count, the related tail call testcases in test_bpf module and
selftests can work well for the interpreter and the JIT.
Here are the test results on x86_64:
# uname -m
x86_64
# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
# dmesg | tail -1
test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/8 JIT'ed]
# rmmod test_bpf
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
# dmesg | tail -1
test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [8/8 JIT'ed]
# rmmod test_bpf
# ./test_progs -t tailcalls
#142 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/11 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
---
v6: Use "ori" instead of "addiu" for mips64, update the commit message,
suggested by Johan Almbladh, thank you.
v5: Use RV_REG_TCC directly to save one move for RISC-V,
suggested by Björn Töpel, thank you.
v4: Use >= as check condition,
suggested by Daniel Borkmann, thank you.
arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 5 +++--
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 5 +++--
arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 3 +--
arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 4 ++--
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 6 ++----
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 7 +++----
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +++---
arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 10 +++++-----
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/core.c | 3 ++-
lib/test_bpf.c | 4 ++--
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
17 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
index eeb6dc0..e59b41e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -1199,7 +1199,8 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
/* tmp2[0] = array, tmp2[1] = index */
- /* if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
+ /*
+ * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
* goto out;
* tail_call_cnt++;
*/
@@ -1208,7 +1209,7 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
tc = arm_bpf_get_reg64(tcc, tmp, ctx);
emit(ARM_CMP_I(tc[0], hi), ctx);
_emit(ARM_COND_EQ, ARM_CMP_I(tc[1], lo), ctx);
- _emit(ARM_COND_HI, ARM_B(jmp_offset), ctx);
+ _emit(ARM_COND_CS, ARM_B(jmp_offset), ctx);
emit(ARM_ADDS_I(tc[1], tc[1], 1), ctx);
emit(ARM_ADC_I(tc[0], tc[0], 0), ctx);
arm_bpf_put_reg64(tcc, tmp, ctx);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 3a8a714..356fb21 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -287,13 +287,14 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
emit(A64_CMP(0, r3, tmp), ctx);
emit(A64_B_(A64_COND_CS, jmp_offset), ctx);
- /* if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
+ /*
+ * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
* goto out;
* tail_call_cnt++;
*/
emit_a64_mov_i64(tmp, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, ctx);
emit(A64_CMP(1, tcc, tmp), ctx);
- emit(A64_B_(A64_COND_HI, jmp_offset), ctx);
+ emit(A64_B_(A64_COND_CS, jmp_offset), ctx);
emit(A64_ADD_I(1, tcc, tcc, 1), ctx);
/* prog = array->ptrs[index];
diff --git a/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index bd996ed..044b11b 100644
--- a/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -1381,8 +1381,7 @@ void build_prologue(struct jit_context *ctx)
* 16-byte area in the parent's stack frame. On a tail call, the
* calling function jumps into the prologue after these instructions.
*/
- emit(ctx, ori, MIPS_R_T9, MIPS_R_ZERO,
- min(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1, 0xffff));
+ emit(ctx, ori, MIPS_R_T9, MIPS_R_ZERO, min(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, 0xffff));
emit(ctx, sw, MIPS_R_T9, 0, MIPS_R_SP);
/*
diff --git a/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 815ade7..6475828 100644
--- a/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ void build_prologue(struct jit_context *ctx)
* On a tail call, the calling function jumps into the prologue
* after this instruction.
*/
- emit(ctx, addiu, tc, MIPS_R_ZERO, min(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1, 0xffff));
+ emit(ctx, ori, tc, MIPS_R_ZERO, min(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, 0xffff));
/* === Entry-point for tail calls === */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 0da31d4..8a4faa0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -221,13 +221,13 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o
PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out);
/*
- * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
+ * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
* goto out;
*/
EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(_R0, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
/* tail_call_cnt++; */
EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDIC(_R0, _R0, 1));
- PPC_BCC(COND_GT, out);
+ PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out);
/* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */
EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(_R3, b2p_index, 2, 0, 29));
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 8b5157c..8571aaf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -228,12 +228,12 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o
PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out);
/*
- * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
+ * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
* goto out;
*/
PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx));
EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT));
- PPC_BCC(COND_GT, out);
+ PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out);
/*
* tail_call_cnt++;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index e649742..529a83b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -799,11 +799,10 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(int insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
emit_bcc(BPF_JGE, lo(idx_reg), RV_REG_T1, off, ctx);
/*
- * temp_tcc = tcc - 1;
- * if (tcc < 0)
+ * if (--tcc < 0)
* goto out;
*/
- emit(rv_addi(RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_TCC, -1), ctx);
+ emit(rv_addi(RV_REG_TCC, RV_REG_TCC, -1), ctx);
off = ninsns_rvoff(tc_ninsn - (ctx->ninsns - start_insn));
emit_bcc(BPF_JSLT, RV_REG_TCC, RV_REG_ZERO, off, ctx);
@@ -829,7 +828,6 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(int insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
if (is_12b_check(off, insn))
return -1;
emit(rv_lw(RV_REG_T0, off, RV_REG_T0), ctx);
- emit(rv_addi(RV_REG_TCC, RV_REG_T1, 0), ctx);
/* Epilogue jumps to *(t0 + 4). */
__build_epilogue(true, ctx);
return 0;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 2ca345c..f4466b7 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -327,12 +327,12 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(int insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
off = ninsns_rvoff(tc_ninsn - (ctx->ninsns - start_insn));
emit_branch(BPF_JGE, RV_REG_A2, RV_REG_T1, off, ctx);
- /* if (TCC-- < 0)
+ /* if (--TCC < 0)
* goto out;
*/
- emit_addi(RV_REG_T1, tcc, -1, ctx);
+ emit_addi(RV_REG_TCC, tcc, -1, ctx);
off = ninsns_rvoff(tc_ninsn - (ctx->ninsns - start_insn));
- emit_branch(BPF_JSLT, tcc, RV_REG_ZERO, off, ctx);
+ emit_branch(BPF_JSLT, RV_REG_TCC, RV_REG_ZERO, off, ctx);
/* prog = array->ptrs[index];
* if (!prog)
@@ -352,7 +352,6 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(int insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
if (is_12b_check(off, insn))
return -1;
emit_ld(RV_REG_T3, off, RV_REG_T2, ctx);
- emit_mv(RV_REG_TCC, RV_REG_T1, ctx);
__build_epilogue(true, ctx);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 1a374d0..3553cfc 100644
--- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
jit->prg);
/*
- * if (tail_call_cnt++ > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
+ * if (tail_call_cnt++ >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
* goto out;
*/
@@ -1381,9 +1381,9 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
EMIT4_IMM(0xa7080000, REG_W0, 1);
/* laal %w1,%w0,off(%r15) */
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xeb000000, 0x00fa, REG_W1, REG_W0, REG_15, off);
- /* clij %w1,MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT,0x2,out */
+ /* clij %w1,MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT-1,0x2,out */
patch_2_clij = jit->prg;
- EMIT6_PCREL_RIEC(0xec000000, 0x007f, REG_W1, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT,
+ EMIT6_PCREL_RIEC(0xec000000, 0x007f, REG_W1, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT - 1,
2, jit->prg);
/*
diff --git a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c
index 9a2f20c..0bfe1c7 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static void emit_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
emit(LD32 | IMMED | RS1(SP) | S13(off) | RD(tmp), ctx);
emit_cmpi(tmp, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, ctx);
#define OFFSET2 13
- emit_branch(BGU, ctx->idx, ctx->idx + OFFSET2, ctx);
+ emit_branch(BGEU, ctx->idx, ctx->idx + OFFSET2, ctx);
emit_nop(ctx);
emit_alu_K(ADD, tmp, 1, ctx);
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 726700f..6318479 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static void emit_indirect_jump(u8 **pprog, int reg, u8 *ip)
* ... bpf_tail_call(void *ctx, struct bpf_array *array, u64 index) ...
* if (index >= array->map.max_entries)
* goto out;
- * if (++tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
+ * if (tail_call_cnt++ >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
* goto out;
* prog = array->ptrs[index];
* if (prog == NULL)
@@ -446,14 +446,14 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call_indirect(u8 **pprog, bool *callee_regs_used,
EMIT2(X86_JBE, offset); /* jbe out */
/*
- * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
+ * if (tail_call_cnt++ >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
* goto out;
*/
EMIT2_off32(0x8B, 0x85, tcc_off); /* mov eax, dword ptr [rbp - tcc_off] */
EMIT3(0x83, 0xF8, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT); /* cmp eax, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT */
offset = ctx->tail_call_indirect_label - (prog + 2 - start);
- EMIT2(X86_JA, offset); /* ja out */
+ EMIT2(X86_JAE, offset); /* jae out */
EMIT3(0x83, 0xC0, 0x01); /* add eax, 1 */
EMIT2_off32(0x89, 0x85, tcc_off); /* mov dword ptr [rbp - tcc_off], eax */
@@ -504,14 +504,14 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call_direct(struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor *poke,
int offset;
/*
- * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
+ * if (tail_call_cnt++ >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
* goto out;
*/
EMIT2_off32(0x8B, 0x85, tcc_off); /* mov eax, dword ptr [rbp - tcc_off] */
EMIT3(0x83, 0xF8, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT); /* cmp eax, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT */
offset = ctx->tail_call_direct_label - (prog + 2 - start);
- EMIT2(X86_JA, offset); /* ja out */
+ EMIT2(X86_JAE, offset); /* jae out */
EMIT3(0x83, 0xC0, 0x01); /* add eax, 1 */
EMIT2_off32(0x89, 0x85, tcc_off); /* mov dword ptr [rbp - tcc_off], eax */
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index da9b7cf..429a89c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **pprog, u8 *ip)
EMIT2(IA32_JBE, jmp_label(jmp_label1, 2));
/*
- * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
+ * if (tail_call_cnt++ >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
* goto out;
*/
lo = (u32)MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT;
@@ -1337,7 +1337,7 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **pprog, u8 *ip)
/* cmp ecx,lo */
EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, IA32_ECX), lo);
- /* ja out */
+ /* jae out */
EMIT2(IA32_JAE, jmp_label(jmp_label1, 2));
/* add eax,0x1 */
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 2be6dfd..4bce7ee 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ struct bpf_array {
};
#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 1000000 /* yes. 1M insns */
-#define MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT 32
+#define MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT 33
#define BPF_F_ACCESS_MASK (BPF_F_RDONLY | \
BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG | \
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index ba5af15..b12cfce 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* if the maximum number of tail calls has been reached for this
* chain of programs. This limit is defined in the kernel by the
* macro **MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT** (not accessible to user space),
- * which is currently set to 32.
+ * which is currently set to 33.
* Return
* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure.
*
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 327e399..870881d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1567,7 +1567,8 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
if (unlikely(index >= array->map.max_entries))
goto out;
- if (unlikely(tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT))
+
+ if (unlikely(tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT))
goto out;
tail_call_cnt++;
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index adae395..0c5cb2d 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -14683,7 +14683,7 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = {
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.flags = FLAG_NEED_STATE | FLAG_RESULT_IN_STATE,
- .result = (MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1 + 1) * MAX_TESTRUNS,
+ .result = (MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1) * MAX_TESTRUNS,
},
{
"Tail call count preserved across function calls",
@@ -14705,7 +14705,7 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = {
},
.stack_depth = 8,
.flags = FLAG_NEED_STATE | FLAG_RESULT_IN_STATE,
- .result = (MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1 + 1) * MAX_TESTRUNS,
+ .result = (MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1) * MAX_TESTRUNS,
},
{
"Tail call error path, NULL target",
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index ba5af15..b12cfce 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* if the maximum number of tail calls has been reached for this
* chain of programs. This limit is defined in the kernel by the
* macro **MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT** (not accessible to user space),
- * which is currently set to 32.
+ * which is currently set to 33.
* Return
* 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure.
*
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists