[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e392bf23c3ae4b93b1ffb23e40728873@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:30:40 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Yang Guang' <davidcomponentone@...il.com>,
"anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com" <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
CC: "jdike@...toit.com" <jdike@...toit.com>,
"johannes.berg@...el.com" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-um@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
"richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
"yang.guang5@....com.cn" <yang.guang5@....com.cn>,
"zealci@....com.cn" <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] um: use swap() to make code cleaner
From: Yang Guang
> Sent: 05 November 2021 06:19
>
> Use the macro 'swap()' defined in 'include/linux/minmax.h' to avoid
> opencoding it.
Is there any real point to any of these patches??
If I'm reading a 'random' piece of code I now have to assume
that swap() is something that 'magically' exchanges two items.
This requires more brain-power than parsing the three lines
that do an actual swap.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists