[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6155622-07fd-d9ab-9174-feb945b1b069@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:10:58 +0200
From: Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@...le.com>,
Ivan Delalande <colona@...sta.com>,
Priyaranjan Jha <priyarjha@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] tcp: authopt: Initial support and key management
On 11/3/21 4:29 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 11/1/21 10:34 AM, Leonard Crestez wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_authopt.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_authopt.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..c412a712f229
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_authopt.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <net/tcp.h>
>> +#include <net/tcp_authopt.h>
>> +#include <crypto/hash.h>
>> +
>> +/* checks that ipv4 or ipv6 addr matches. */
>> +static bool ipvx_addr_match(struct sockaddr_storage *a1,
>> + struct sockaddr_storage *a2)
>> +{
>> + if (a1->ss_family != a2->ss_family)
>> + return false;
>> + if (a1->ss_family == AF_INET &&
>> + (((struct sockaddr_in *)a1)->sin_addr.s_addr !=
>> + ((struct sockaddr_in *)a2)->sin_addr.s_addr))
>> + return false;
>> + if (a1->ss_family == AF_INET6 &&
>> + !ipv6_addr_equal(&((struct sockaddr_in6 *)a1)->sin6_addr,
>> + &((struct sockaddr_in6 *)a2)->sin6_addr))
>> + return false;
>
> The above 2 could just be
>
> if (a1->ss_family == AF_INET)
> return (((struct sockaddr_in *)a1)->sin_addr.s_addr ==
> ((struct sockaddr_in *)a2)->sin_addr.s_addr))
OK. The function is a little weird that it has a final "return true"
which is technically also reachable if AF is unexpected but that
situation is prevented from higher up.
--
Regards,
Leonard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists