[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211105134139.GC2001@kadam>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:41:39 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc: Larry.Finger@...inger.net, phil@...lpotter.co.uk,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, straube.linux@...il.com,
fmdefrancesco@...il.com, saurav.girepunje@...il.com,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: remove unneeded variable
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:32:26AM +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> @@ -1611,7 +1610,6 @@ unsigned int OnAtim(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_frame *precv_frame)
>
> unsigned int on_action_spct(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_frame *precv_frame)
> {
> - unsigned int ret = _FAIL;
> struct sta_info *psta = NULL;
> struct sta_priv *pstapriv = &padapter->stapriv;
> u8 *pframe = precv_frame->rx_data;
> @@ -1644,7 +1642,7 @@ unsigned int on_action_spct(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_frame *precv_f
> }
>
> exit:
> - return ret;
> + return _FAIL;
> }
Heh... Let's make it return success on the success path. The other
implementation of this in rtl8723bs/ is wrong too.
No one ever checks, but it's called as a function pointer so we can't
make it void without changing a bunch of other code.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists