linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in ktime_get_coarse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Nov 2021 08:53:06 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+43fd005b5a1b4d10781e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, sboyd@...nel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rosted@...dmis.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Dmitrii Banshchikov <me@...que.spb.ru>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in ktime_get_coarse_ts64

On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 6:10 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> >
> > -> #0 (tk_core.seq.seqcount){----}-{0:0}:
> >        check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3051 [inline]
> >        check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 [inline]
> >        validate_chain+0x1dfb/0x8240 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789
> >        __lock_acquire+0x1382/0x2b00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015
> >        lock_acquire+0x19f/0x4d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625
> >        seqcount_lockdep_reader_access+0xfe/0x230 include/linux/seqlock.h:103
> >        ktime_get_coarse_ts64+0x25/0x110 kernel/time/timekeeping.c:2255
> >        ktime_get_coarse include/linux/timekeeping.h:120 [inline]
> >        ktime_get_coarse_ns include/linux/timekeeping.h:126 [inline]
>
> --> this call is invalid
>
> >        ____bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns kernel/bpf/helpers.c:173 [inline]
> >        bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns+0x7e/0x130 kernel/bpf/helpers.c:171
> >        bpf_prog_a99735ebafdda2f1+0x10/0xb50
> >        bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:721 [inline]
> >        __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:626 [inline]
> >        bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:633 [inline]
> >        BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY include/linux/bpf.h:1294 [inline]
> >        trace_call_bpf+0x2cf/0x5d0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:127
> >        perf_trace_run_bpf_submit+0x7b/0x1d0 kernel/events/core.c:9708
> >        perf_trace_lock+0x37c/0x440 include/trace/events/lock.h:39
> >        trace_lock_release+0x128/0x150 include/trace/events/lock.h:58
>
> Timestamps from within a tracepoint can only be taken with:
>
>          1) jiffies
>          2) sched_clock()
>          3) ktime_get_*_fast_ns()
>
> Those are NMI safe and can be invoked from anywhere.
>
> All other time getters which have to use the timekeeping seqcount
> protection are prone to live locks and _cannot_ be used from
> tracepoints ever.

Obviously.
That helper was added for networking use cases and accidentally
enabled for tracing.