linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] mm/highmem: Remove deprecated kmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YYVofyW3txoT9RLM@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 5 Nov 2021 17:23:11 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Prathu Baronia <prathubaronia2011@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chintan.pandya@...plus.com,
        Prathu Baronia <prathu.baronia@...plus.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] mm/highmem: Remove deprecated kmap_atomic

On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 09:58:59AM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:51:40PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:50:37PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 03:56:25PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:33:07 -0800 Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > This already has my signed off by so I'm not going to 'review'.  With Prathu's
> > > > > testing information I hope this can land.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Andrew did you see this patch?
> > > > 
> > > > I did now ;)
> > > > 
> > > > Tossed onto the post-rc1 pile, thanks,
> > > 
> > > This patch seems to have slipped through the gaps for a couple of cycles
> > > now?  I found a missed spot in it for CONFIG_HIGHMEM:
> > 
> > Ugh, sorry, wrong version of the patch.
> 
> Check!  Yea this works for me...
> 
> I think this should to through as a separate patch because Prathu's has been
> soaking for some time.  No need to complicate it with this.

This isn't "complicating Prathu's patch".  This is "fixing up the bit
that Prathu missed with his patch".  zero_user_segments() should not
have different rules on HIGHMEM and non-HIGHMEM kernels.