lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:06:22 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [peterz-queue:x86/wip.extable 1/22] drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_driver.c:117:18:
 warning: result of comparison of constant 18446744073709551615 with
 expression of type 'typeof (_Generic((mask), char: (unsigned char)0, unsigned
 char: (unsigned char)0, signed char: (unsigned char)0, unsigned shor...

On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 5:21 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 06:17:44PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git x86/wip.extable
> > head:   a4d149db054a77aa35b04bb088f749cbb9a2edea
> > commit: 4b9e954553a4137f7504e068438851c27edc6b22 [1/22] bitfield.h: Fix "type of reg too small for mask" test
> > config: riscv-randconfig-r032-20211105 (attached as .config)
> > compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 847a6807332b13f43704327c2d30103ec0347c77)
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >         # install riscv cross compiling tool for clang build
> >         # apt-get install binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu
> >         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/commit/?id=4b9e954553a4137f7504e068438851c27edc6b22
> >         git remote add peterz-queue https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git
> >         git fetch --no-tags peterz-queue x86/wip.extable
> >         git checkout 4b9e954553a4137f7504e068438851c27edc6b22
> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 ARCH=riscv
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> >
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > >> drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_driver.c:117:18: warning: result of comparison of constant 18446744073709551615 with expression of type 'typeof (_Generic((mask), char: (unsigned char)0, unsigned char: (unsigned char)0, signed char: (unsigned char)0, unsigned short: (unsigned short)0, short: (unsigned short)0, unsigned int: (unsigned int)0, int: (unsigned int)0, unsigned long: (unsigned long)0, long: (unsigned long)0, unsigned long long: (unsigned long long)0, long long: (unsigned long long)0, default: (mask)))' (aka 'unsigned int') is always false [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
> >            cache_params |= FIELD_PREP(mask, val);
> >                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >    include/linux/bitfield.h:111:3: note: expanded from macro 'FIELD_PREP'
> >                    __BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, 0ULL, _val, "FIELD_PREP: ");    \
> >                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >    include/linux/bitfield.h:68:53: note: expanded from macro '__BF_FIELD_CHECK'
> >                    BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__bf_cast_unsigned(_mask, _mask) >     \
> >                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
> >    include/linux/build_bug.h:39:58: note: expanded from macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
> >    #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
> >                                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
> >    include/linux/compiler_types.h:322:22: note: expanded from macro 'compiletime_assert'
> >            _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> >            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >    include/linux/compiler_types.h:310:23: note: expanded from macro '_compiletime_assert'
> >            __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
> >            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >    include/linux/compiler_types.h:302:9: note: expanded from macro '__compiletime_assert'
> >                    if (!(condition))                                       \
> >                          ^~~~~~~~~
>
> I'm confused here.. the code reads:
>
>
> #define __scalar_type_to_unsigned_cases(type)                           \
>                 unsigned type:  (unsigned type)0,                       \
>                 signed type:    (unsigned type)0
>
> #define __unsigned_scalar_typeof(x) typeof(                             \
>                 _Generic((x),                                           \
>                         char:   (unsigned char)0,                       \
>                         __scalar_type_to_unsigned_cases(char),          \
>                         __scalar_type_to_unsigned_cases(short),         \
>                         __scalar_type_to_unsigned_cases(int),           \
>                         __scalar_type_to_unsigned_cases(long),          \
>                         __scalar_type_to_unsigned_cases(long long),     \
>                         default: (x)))
>
> #define __bf_cast_unsigned(type, x)     ((__unsigned_scalar_typeof(type))(x))
>
> #define __BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, _reg, _val, _pfx)                       \
>         ({                                                              \
>                 BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__builtin_constant_p(_mask),          \
>                                  _pfx "mask is not constant");          \
>                 BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG((_mask) == 0, _pfx "mask is zero");    \
>                 BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__builtin_constant_p(_val) ?           \
>                                  ~((_mask) >> __bf_shf(_mask)) & (_val) : 0, \
>                                  _pfx "value too large for the field"); \
>                 BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__bf_cast_unsigned(_mask, _mask) >     \
>                                  __bf_cast_unsigned(_reg, ~0ull),       \
>                                  _pfx "type of reg too small for mask"); \
>                 __BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2((_mask) +                 \
>                                               (1ULL << __bf_shf(_mask))); \
>         })
>
> #define FIELD_PREP(_mask, _val)                                         \
>         ({                                                              \
>                 __BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, 0ULL, _val, "FIELD_PREP: ");    \
>                 ((typeof(_mask))(_val) << __bf_shf(_mask)) & (_mask);   \
>         })
>
>
> static void init_cc_cache_params(struct cc_drvdata *drvdata)
> {
>         struct device *dev = drvdata_to_dev(drvdata);
>         u32 cache_params, ace_const, val, mask;
>
>         ...
>
>         mask = CC_GENMASK(CC_AXIM_CACHE_PARAMS_AWCACHE);        <-- *BOOM*
>         cache_params &= ~mask;
>         cache_params |= FIELD_PREP(mask, val);
>
>         ...
> }
>
> So we're having "(unsigned int)mask > (unsigned long long)~0ull" as
> a compile time constant input to the BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(), and clang-14 is
> now complaining it's a constant ?!?

No, the error message (trimmed for clarity):
>> warning: result of comparison of constant 18446744073709551615  (ie ~0ull / ULLONG_MAX) with expression of type ... 'unsigned int') is always false [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]

Is `val` an int, but should be a long long? We're comparing if an
unsigned int is greater than ULLONG_MAX, which is impossible (or
rather a tautology; something that's always either true or false, in
this case false).  Or maybe mask and reg are different widths?

>
> It is that by design.
>


-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ