[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYWyB1UmQxo0a2WU@google.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 15:36:55 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: lianzhi chang <changlianzhi@...ontech.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
282827961@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12] tty: Fix the keyboard led light display problem
Hi lianzhi
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 09:48:16PM +0800, lianzhi chang wrote:
> Switching from the desktop environment to the tty environment,
> the state of the keyboard led lights and the state of the keyboard
> lock are inconsistent. This is because the attribute kb->kbdmode
> of the tty bound in the desktop environment (Xorg) is set to
> VC_OFF, which causes the ledstate and kb->ledflagstate
> values of the bound tty to always be 0, which causes the switch
> from the desktop When to the tty environment, the LED light
> status is inconsistent with the keyboard lock status.
> In order to ensure that the keyboard LED lights are displayed
> normally during the VT switching process, when the VT is
> switched, the current VT LED configuration is forced to be issued.
>
> Signed-off-by: lianzhi chang <changlianzhi@...ontech.com>
> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> v10:
> The led state of the input device is no longer synchronized to
> ledstate, and the related code is deleted. The current plan is
> changed to: when the VT is switched, the LED state saved by the
> current VT is forced to be issued.
> v11:
> Supplement the signature of the collaborator.
>
> drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c b/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c
> index c7fbbcdcc346..20013c45b979 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ static int shift_state = 0;
>
> static unsigned int ledstate = -1U; /* undefined */
> static unsigned char ledioctl;
> +static bool vt_switch;
>
> /*
> * Notifier list for console keyboard events
> @@ -412,8 +413,12 @@ static void do_compute_shiftstate(void)
> /* We still have to export this method to vt.c */
> void vt_set_leds_compute_shiftstate(void)
> {
> + struct kbd_struct *kb;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + kb = kbd_table + fg_console;
> + if (kb->kbdmode != VC_OFF)
> + vt_switch = true;
Could you please add explanation here why it is not racy (I do not think
it is as I believe currently executed tasklets can be scheduled).
> set_leds();
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&kbd_event_lock, flags);
> @@ -1247,14 +1252,24 @@ void vt_kbd_con_stop(unsigned int console)
> */
> static void kbd_bh(struct tasklet_struct *unused)
> {
> + struct kbd_struct *kb;
> unsigned int leds;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + kb = kbd_table + fg_console;
> + if (kb->kbdmode == VC_OFF)
> + return;
Why do we need to do this? Won't this stop setting arbitrary LEDs via
console ioctl?
> +
> spin_lock_irqsave(&led_lock, flags);
> leds = getleds();
> leds |= (unsigned int)kbd->lockstate << 8;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&led_lock, flags);
>
> + if (vt_switch) {
> + ledstate = ~leds;
> + vt_switch = false;
> + }
> +
> if (leds != ledstate) {
> kbd_propagate_led_state(ledstate, leds);
> ledstate = leds;
> @@ -1643,6 +1658,8 @@ int __init kbd_init(void)
> int i;
> int error;
>
> + vt_switch = false;
No need to explicitly initialize it here, as a static variable it will
be automatically initialized to 0 (false).
> +
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_CONSOLES; i++) {
> kbd_table[i].ledflagstate = kbd_defleds();
> kbd_table[i].default_ledflagstate = kbd_defleds();
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists