[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <HK0PR06MB27868D14ED8DF7550246674CB28F9@HK0PR06MB2786.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:01:23 +0000
From: Chin-Ting Kuo <chin-ting_kuo@...eedtech.com>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
CC: BMC-SW <BMC-SW@...eedtech.com>,
Steven Lee <steven_lee@...eedtech.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 02/10] sdhci: aspeed: Add SDR50 support
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the review.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 8:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] sdhci: aspeed: Add SDR50 support
>
> Hi Chin-Ting,
>
> Sorry for the delay in looking at your series.
>
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021, at 20:01, Chin-Ting Kuo wrote:
> > From the analog waveform analysis result, SD/SDIO controller of
> > AST2600 cannot always work well with 200MHz. The upper bound stable
> > frequency for SD/SDIO controller is 100MHz. Thus, SDR50 supported bit,
> > instead of SDR104, in capability 2 register should be set in advance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chin-Ting Kuo <chin-ting_kuo@...eedtech.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> > index 6e4e132903a6..c6eaeb02e3f9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
> > #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V (0 * 32 + 26)
> > /* SDIO{14,24} */
> > #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104 (1 * 32 + 1)
> > +/* SDIO{14,24} */
>
> I don't think we need to duplicate this comment.
Okay, it will be modified in the next patch version.
>
> > +#define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 (1 * 32 + 0)
>
> Can we keep the defines in increasing bit order (i.e. put
> ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 above ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104)?
>
Okay.
> >
> > struct aspeed_sdc {
> > struct clk *clk;
> > @@ -410,11 +412,17 @@ static int aspeed_sdhci_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > sdhci_get_of_property(pdev);
> >
> > if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-hs200-1_8v") ||
> > + of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50") ||
>
> Minor formatting issue, but can you make sure all the conditions are aligned
> vertically from the left?
>
It will also be updated in the next patch version.
> > of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) {
> > aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent,
> ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V,
> > true, slot);
> > }
> >
> > + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50")) {
> > + aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent,
> ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50,
> > + true, slot);
> > + }
> > +
> > if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) {
> > aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent,
> ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104,
> > true, slot);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
Chin-Ting
Powered by blists - more mailing lists