linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] x86: Add definitions for the Intel Hardware Feedback Interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YYZZWzNWdmeCFBAd@zn.tnic>
Date:   Sat, 6 Nov 2021 11:30:51 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] x86: Add definitions for the Intel Hardware Feedback
 Interface

On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 06:33:07PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Add the CPUID feature bit and the model-specific registers needed to
> identify and configure the Intel Hardware Feedback Interface.
> 
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h   | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index d0ce5cfd3ac1..d76d8daf1b2b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@ -325,6 +325,7 @@
>  #define X86_FEATURE_HWP_ACT_WINDOW	(14*32+ 9) /* HWP Activity Window */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP		(14*32+10) /* HWP Energy Perf. Preference */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_HWP_PKG_REQ		(14*32+11) /* HWP Package Level Request */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_INTEL_HFI		(14*32+19) /* Hardware Feedback Interface */

X86_FEATURE_HFI

i.e., without the vendor name is perfectly fine.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette