[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHP4M8XaWtagZcocGoeT2Rb6F6JeKqMFa2ZzTZ0ddCES0-T-jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 17:46:45 +0530
From: Ajay Garg <ajaygargnsit@...il.com>
To: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: vt: keyboard: initialize "kbs" so that kfree(kbs)
runs fine even if kbs is not kmalloced.
Hi Pavel,
Thanks for the review.
>
> Please, don't put change log into commit message. It should go under ---
>
Ok, many thanks Pavel.
Will take care in all my future patches.
>
> These is only one caller of vt_do_kdgkb_ioctl, which simple does:
>
>
> case KDGKBSENT:
> case KDSKBSENT:
> return vt_do_kdgkb_ioctl(cmd, up, perm);
>
> It means, that cmd can not be different from KDGKBSENT and KDSKBSENT.
>
> I guess, you found this "issue" via static analysis tool like smatch or
> smth similar, but this bug is impossible right now.
>
Yes, following was reported by smatch (amongst others) :
vt_do_kdgkb_ioctl() error: uninitialized symbol 'kbs'.
Regarding the current state, "vt_do_kdgkb_ioctl" should ideally behave
correctly independently, without bothering whether a cmd is a valid
one. From that perspective, it makes sense to ensure that kfree never
crashes.
However, I don't have any strong opinions on what is right or what is
wrong, as long as things work fine.
So, if there is a general consensus that the change should not be made
currently, I would be ok.
In case the change should be made, kindly let me know, I will post the
v3 patch (making change as per the review-comment of moving changelog
below ---).
Thanks and Regards,
Ajay
Powered by blists - more mailing lists