[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYZxB0LN2iYhj+nz@aurel32.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 13:11:51 +0100
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...el32.net>
To: guoren@...nel.org
Cc: anup@...infault.org, atish.patra@....com, maz@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, palmer@...belt.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com>,
Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7] irqchip/sifive-plic: Fixup EOI failed when masked
On 2021-11-05 17:47, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the driver,
> only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq is blocked by
> hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq source which has
> been disabled in enable register. The bug was firstly reported in [1].
>
> Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]:
>
> The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by
> writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the claim/complete
> register. The PLIC does not check whether the completion ID is the same
> as the last claim ID for that target. If the completion ID does not match
> an interrupt source that is currently enabled for the target, the
> ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
> completion is silently ignored.
>
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html
> [2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc
>
> Fixes: bb0fed1c60cc ("irqchip/sifive-plic: Switch to fasteoi flow")
> Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
> Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
> Cc: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
> Cc: incent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com>
Thanks for this patch. From what I understand, it fixes among other
things the possibility to read the DA9063 RTC more than once.
Does it means that we could now enable it in the device tree? I mean
something like the following patch that unfortunately I can't test now:
diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
index 2e4ea84f27e7..c357b48582f7 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
@@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ pmic@58 {
interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
interrupt-controller;
+ onkey {
+ compatible = "dlg,da9063-onkey";
+ };
+
regulators {
vdd_bcore1: bcore1 {
regulator-min-microvolt = <900000>;
@@ -205,6 +209,14 @@ vdd_ldo11: ldo11 {
regulator-always-on;
};
};
+
+ rtc {
+ compatible = "dlg,da9063-rtc";
+ };
+
+ wdt {
+ compatible = "dlg,da9063-watchdog";
+ };
};
};
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@...el32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists