[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhSdy1vyCQdv_gNaNSzU79PC4giCAig6hzgD9JXSXs6+gfFPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 19:15:25 +0530
From: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com>,
Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7] irqchip/sifive-plic: Fixup EOI failed when masked
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 3:18 PM <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the driver,
> only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq is blocked by
> hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq source which has
> been disabled in enable register. The bug was firstly reported in [1].
>
> Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]:
>
> The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by
> writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the claim/complete
> register. The PLIC does not check whether the completion ID is the same
> as the last claim ID for that target. If the completion ID does not match
> an interrupt source that is currently enabled for the target, the
> ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
> completion is silently ignored.
>
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html
> [2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc
>
> Fixes: bb0fed1c60cc ("irqchip/sifive-plic: Switch to fasteoi flow")
> Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Regards,
Anup
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
> Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
> Cc: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
> Cc: incent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes since V7:
> - Add Fixes tag
> - Add Tested-by
> - Add Cc stable
>
> Changes since V6:
> - Propagate to plic_irq_eoi for all riscv,plic by Nikita Shubin
> - Remove thead related codes
>
> Changes since V5:
> - Move back to mask/unmask
> - Fixup the problem in eoi callback
> - Remove allwinner,sun20i-d1 IRQCHIP_DECLARE
> - Rewrite comment log
>
> Changes since V4:
> - Update comment by Anup
>
> Changes since V3:
> - Rename "c9xx" to "c900"
> - Add sifive_plic_chip and thead_plic_chip for difference
>
> Changes since V2:
> - Add a separate compatible string "thead,c9xx-plic"
> - set irq_mask/unmask of "plic_chip" to NULL and point
> irq_enable/disable of "plic_chip" to plic_irq_mask/unmask
> - Add a detailed comment block in plic_init() about the
> differences in Claim/Completion process of RISC-V PLIC and C9xx
> PLIC.
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> index cf74cfa82045..259065d271ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,13 @@ static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
>
> - writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> + if (irqd_irq_masked(d)) {
> + plic_irq_unmask(d);
> + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> + plic_irq_mask(d);
> + } else {
> + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> + }
> }
>
> static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists