| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CABVgOSnQ9qGtu0nEKePH+Zb1oR2osmVh791zyQ9P61SNznryrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 12:06:57 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc: brendanhiggins@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kunit: tool: add --kconfig_add to allow easily
tweaking kunitconfigs
On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 9:31 AM 'Daniel Latypov' via KUnit Development
<kunit-dev@...glegroups.com> wrote:
>
> E.g. run tests but with KASAN
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 --kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y
This is very neat, thank you. I'm definitely going to use this quite a bit.
My only real note is that we'll need to add some documentation (but
since the KUnit documentation is being reworked at the moment, I'm
okay with doing that later to avoid merge conflicts).
> This also works with --kunitconfig
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 --kunitconfig=fs/ext4 --kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y
It's also worth noting that this can be appended multiple times to set
multiple options, which is useful
> This flag is inspired by TuxMake's --kconfig-add, see
> https://gitlab.com/Linaro/tuxmake#examples.
>
> Our version just uses "_" as the delimiter for consistency with
> pre-existing flags like --build_dir, --make_options, --kernel_args, etc.
>
> Note: this does make it easier to run into a pre-existing edge case:
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 --kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64
> This second invocation ^ still has KASAN enabled!
This behaviour is quite useful, and actually means we can turn on
individual items with
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config --kconfig_add=<option>
> kunit.py won't call olddefconfig if our current .config is already a
> superset of the provided kunitconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 8 ++++++++
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 5 +++++
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> index 68e6f461c758..be58f4c93806 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> @@ -280,6 +280,10 @@ def add_common_opts(parser) -> None:
> ' If given a directory, (e.g. lib/kunit), "/.kunitconfig" '
> 'will get automatically appended.',
> metavar='kunitconfig')
> + parser.add_argument('--kconfig_add',
> + help='Additional Kconfig options to append to the '
> + '.kunitconfig, e.g. CONFIG_KASAN=y. Can be repeated.',
> + action='append')
>
> parser.add_argument('--arch',
> help=('Specifies the architecture to run tests under. '
> @@ -398,6 +402,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None):
> if not linux:
> linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
> kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
> + kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add,
> arch=cli_args.arch,
> cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile,
> qemu_config_path=cli_args.qemu_config)
> @@ -423,6 +428,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None):
> if not linux:
> linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
> kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
> + kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add,
> arch=cli_args.arch,
> cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile,
> qemu_config_path=cli_args.qemu_config)
> @@ -439,6 +445,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None):
> if not linux:
> linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
> kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
> + kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add,
> arch=cli_args.arch,
> cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile,
> qemu_config_path=cli_args.qemu_config)
> @@ -457,6 +464,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None):
> if not linux:
> linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
> kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
> + kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add,
> arch=cli_args.arch,
> cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile,
> qemu_config_path=cli_args.qemu_config)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> index 51ee6e5dae91..7d459d6d6ff2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object):
> build_dir: str,
> load_config=True,
> kunitconfig_path='',
> + kconfig_add: Optional[List[str]]=None,
> arch=None,
> cross_compile=None,
> qemu_config_path=None) -> None:
> @@ -249,6 +250,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object):
> shutil.copyfile(DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH, kunitconfig_path)
>
> self._kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kunitconfig_path)
> + if kconfig_add:
> + kconfig = kunit_config.parse_from_string('\n'.join(kconfig_add))
> + self._kconfig.merge_in_entries(kconfig)
> +
>
> def clean(self) -> bool:
> try:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> index 4ec70e41ec5a..7e42a7c27987 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> @@ -334,6 +334,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase):
> pass
> kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=dir)
>
> + def test_kconfig_add(self):
> + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kconfig_add=['CONFIG_NOT_REAL=y'])
> + self.assertIn(kunit_config.KconfigEntry('NOT_REAL', 'y'), tree._kconfig.entries())
> +
> def test_invalid_arch(self):
> with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, 'not a valid arch, options are.*x86_64'):
> kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', arch='invalid')
> @@ -540,6 +544,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
> # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
> mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
> kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig',
> + kconfig_add=None,
> arch='um',
> cross_compile=None,
> qemu_config_path=None)
> @@ -551,6 +556,19 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
> # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
> mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
> kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig',
> + kconfig_add=None,
> + arch='um',
> + cross_compile=None,
> + qemu_config_path=None)
> +
> + @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree')
> + def test_run_kconfig_add(self, mock_linux_init):
> + mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock
> + kunit.main(['run', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KCSAN=y'])
> + # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
> + mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
> + kunitconfig_path=None,
> + kconfig_add=['CONFIG_KASAN=y', 'CONFIG_KCSAN=y'],
> arch='um',
> cross_compile=None,
> qemu_config_path=None)
> --
> 2.34.0.rc0.344.g81b53c2807-goog
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/20211106013058.2621799-2-dlatypov%40google.com.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists