linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 14/19] pinctrl: st: Use temporary variable for struct device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 06 Nov 2021 00:50:23 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Sai Krishna Potthuri <lakshmi.sai.krishna.potthuri@...inx.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamv2005@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 14/19] pinctrl: st: Use temporary variable for struct
 device

On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 14:42 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Use temporary variable for struct device to make code neater.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
[]
> @@ -814,26 +814,25 @@ static int st_pctl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>  {
>  	struct st_pinctrl *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
>  	const struct st_pctl_group *grp;
> +	struct device *dev = info->dev;
[]
> -	new_map = devm_kcalloc(pctldev->dev,
> -				map_num, sizeof(*new_map), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	new_map = devm_kcalloc(dev, map_num, sizeof(*new_map), GFP_KERNEL);

Are pctldev->dev and dev the same pointer?
It seems they are not.
Why reassign the ownership?