[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3961ecdf78e7f88a467650638e5935ea413bb8f.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 08:13:08 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: cgel.zte@...il.com, kartilak@...co.com
Cc: sebaddel@...co.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jing Yao <yao.jing2@....com.cn>, Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: snic: Replace snprintf in show functions with
sysfs_emit
On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 08:14 +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Jing Yao <yao.jing2@....com.cn>
>
> coccicheck complains about the use of snprintf() in sysfs show
> functions:
> WARNING use scnprintf or sprintf
>
> Use sysfs_emit instead of scnprintf, snprintf or sprintf makes more
> sense.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_attrs.c b/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_attrs.c
[]
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ snic_show_state(struct device *dev,
> {
> struct snic *snic = shost_priv(class_to_shost(dev));
>
> - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n",
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n",
> snic_state_str[snic_get_state(snic)]);
> }
when you do these, please consider the ability to rewrap to 80 columns.
return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", snic_state_str[snic_get_state(snic)]);
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ snic_show_link_state(struct device *dev,
> if (snic->config.xpt_type == SNIC_DAS)
> snic->link_status = svnic_dev_link_status(snic->vdev);
>
> - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n",
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n",
> (snic->link_status) ? "Link Up" : "Link Down");
And maintain parenthesis alignment
return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n",
snic->link_status ? "Link Up" : "Link Down");
or maybe
return sysfs_emit(buf, "Link %s\n", snic->link_status ? "Up" : "Down");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists