[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a22c22d-94b1-f519-27a2-ae0b8bbf6e99@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 09:08:11 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Joshua Thompson <funaho@...ai.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@...gle.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 27/45] mfd: ntxec: Use devm_register_power_handler()
On 11/7/21 8:53 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 06.11.2021 23:54, Jonathan Neuschäfer пишет:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:16:57AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> Use devm_register_power_handler() that replaces global pm_power_off
>>> variable and allows to register multiple power-off handlers. It also
>>> provides restart-handler support, i.e. all in one API.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> When I boot with (most of) this patchset applied, I get the warning at
>> kernel/reboot.c:187:
>>
>> /*
>> * Handler must have unique priority. Otherwise call order is
>> * determined by registration order, which is unreliable.
>> */
>> WARN_ON(!atomic_notifier_has_unique_priority(&restart_handler_list, nb));
>>
>> As the NTXEC driver doesn't specify a priority, I think this is an issue
>> to be fixed elsewhere.
>>
>> Other than that, it works and looks good, as far as I can tell.
>>
>>
>> For this patch:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
>> Tested-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
>
> Thank you. You have conflicting restart handlers, apparently NTXEC
> driver should have higher priority than the watchdog driver. It should
> be a common problem for the watchdog drivers, I will lower watchdog's
> default priority to fix it.
>
The watchdog subsystem already uses "0" as default priority, which was
intended as priority of last resort for restart handlers. I do not see
a reason to change that.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists