[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97e93876-d654-0a89-dce1-6fe1189345e2@kali.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:21:16 -0600
From: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>
To: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@....com,
will@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, amitk@...nel.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, amit.kachhap@...il.com,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Refactor thermal pressure update to avoid code
duplication
Hi Thara,
> Hi Steev,
>
> IIUC, PineBook Pro has Rockchip RK3399 which has 2 Cortex A-72 and 4
> Cortex A-52 where as C630 has Qualcomm sdm845 which has 4 Cortex A-75
> and 4 Cortex A-55. Task placements and subsequently cpu load will be
> different for both the platforms. With the same workload, I will
> expect Rockchip to system to be more loaded than sdm845. Having said
> that, what cpu-freq governor are you using on both the systems.
>
I'm using sched-util on both of the systems.
I've tried a number of different ways of forcing builds only on the A-75
cores, and I simply cannot get the load to be "enough" to kick in the
boost frequency.
An example being
git clone https://github.com/zellij-org/zellij.git
cd zellij
taskset --cpu-list 4-7 cargo build --release
git clean -fdx
taskset --cpu-list 6-7 cargo build --release
On my C630, it never goes higher than 85C with the 4 cores being used,
and with 2, it never goes about 65C and I do not get any 2.96GHz. It's
currently sitting at "6" in the time_in_state for 2965800.
--steev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists