linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] selftests/x86/amx: Update the ARCH_REQ_XCOMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211108233501.11516-3-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Date:   Mon,  8 Nov 2021 15:35:01 -0800
From:   "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        bp@...en8.de, mingo@...hat.com, yang.zhong@...el.com,
        jing2.liu@...el.com, chang.seok.bae@...el.com,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/x86/amx: Update the ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_PERM test

Update the arch_prctl test to check the permission bitmap whether the
requested feature is added as expected or not.

Every non-dynamic feature that is enabled is permitted already for use.
TILECFG is not dynamic feature. Ensure the bit is always on from
ARCH_GET_XCOMP_PERM.

Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/amx.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/amx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/amx.c
index 3615ef4a48bb..e1e2c8f3356f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/amx.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/amx.c
@@ -368,9 +368,16 @@ static void req_xtiledata_perm(void)
 
 static void validate_req_xcomp_perm(enum expected_result exp)
 {
-	unsigned long bitmask;
+	unsigned long bitmask, expected_bitmask;
 	long rc;
 
+	rc = syscall(SYS_arch_prctl, ARCH_GET_XCOMP_PERM, &bitmask);
+	if (rc) {
+		fatal_error("prctl(ARCH_GET_XCOMP_PERM) error: %ld", rc);
+	} else if (!(bitmask & XFEATURE_MASK_XTILECFG)) {
+		fatal_error("ARCH_GET_XCOMP_PERM returns XFEATURE_XTILECFG off.");
+	}
+
 	rc = syscall(SYS_arch_prctl, ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_PERM, XFEATURE_XTILEDATA);
 	if (exp == FAIL_EXPECTED) {
 		if (rc) {
@@ -383,10 +390,15 @@ static void validate_req_xcomp_perm(enum expected_result exp)
 		fatal_error("ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_PERM saw unexpected failure.\n");
 	}
 
+	expected_bitmask = bitmask | XFEATURE_MASK_XTILEDATA;
+
 	rc = syscall(SYS_arch_prctl, ARCH_GET_XCOMP_PERM, &bitmask);
 	if (rc) {
 		fatal_error("prctl(ARCH_GET_XCOMP_PERM) error: %ld", rc);
-	} else if (bitmask & XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE) {
+	} else if (bitmask != expected_bitmask) {
+		fatal_error("ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_PERM saw a wrong bitmask: %lx, expected: %lx.\n",
+			    bitmask, expected_bitmask);
+	} else {
 		printf("\tARCH_REQ_XCOMP_PERM is successful.\n");
 	}
 }
-- 
2.17.1