[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYjKd/UwdwrbnrNd@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 07:57:59 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, ldv-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 68/77] sctp: add vtag check in sctp_sf_violation
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 04:52:28PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 05:12:16PM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > It seems the patch may lead to NULL pointer dereference.
> >
> >
> > 1. sctp_sf_violation_chunk() calls sctp_sf_violation() with asoc arg
> > equal to NULL.
> >
> > static enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_violation_chunk(
> > ...
> > {
> > ...
> > if (!asoc)
> > return sctp_sf_violation(net, ep, asoc, type, arg, commands);
> > ...
> >
> > 2. Newly added code of sctp_sf_violation() calls to sctp_vtag_verify()
> > with asoc arg equal to NULL.
> >
> > enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_violation(struct net *net,
> > ...
> > {
> > struct sctp_chunk *chunk = arg;
> >
> > if (!sctp_vtag_verify(chunk, asoc))
> > return sctp_sf_pdiscard(net, ep, asoc, type, arg, commands);
> > ...
> >
> > 3. sctp_vtag_verify() dereferences asoc without any check.
> >
> > /* Check VTAG of the packet matches the sender's own tag. */
> > static inline int
> > sctp_vtag_verify(const struct sctp_chunk *chunk,
> > const struct sctp_association *asoc)
> > {
> > /* RFC 2960 Sec 8.5 When receiving an SCTP packet, the endpoint
> > * MUST ensure that the value in the Verification Tag field of
> > * the received SCTP packet matches its own Tag. If the received
> > * Verification Tag value does not match the receiver's own
> > * tag value, the receiver shall silently discard the packet...
> > */
> > if (ntohl(chunk->sctp_hdr->vtag) != asoc->c.my_vtag)
> > return 0;
> >
> >
> > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE tool.
>
> These issues should all be the same with Linus's tree, so can you please
> submit patches to the normal netdev developers and mailing list to
> resolve the above issues?
Given a lack of response, I am going to assume that these are not real
issues. If you think they are, please submit patches to the network
developers to resolve them.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists