linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211108074414.GA24829@lst.de>
Date:   Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:44:14 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16

On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 01:36:27PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> configfs has two current maintainers, I don't think we need another one,
> but they should have at least responded to the patch series previously

I've clearly stated that I'm not going to take these "interesting" new
atomic semantics without an ACK from Al.  And to be honest even with that
feature creep isn't exactly on my wish list.