[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <583a2f1b-1ac8-0a30-1b0a-e541ce739448@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:26:04 +0800
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: Copy kvm_pmu_ops by value to eliminate
layer of indirection
On 5/11/2021 11:36 pm, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 03, 2021, Like Xu wrote:
>> I would also say land this memcpy() above kvm_ops_static_call_update(), then the
>> enabling patch can do the static call updates in kvm_ops_static_call_update()
>> instead of adding another helper.
>
> Ugh, kvm_ops_static_call_update() is defined in kvm_host.h. That's completely
> unnecessary, it should have exactly one caller, kvm_arch_hardware_setup(). As a
> prep match, move kvm_ops_static_call_update() to x86.c, then it can reference the
> pmu ops.
Quite good and thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists