[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYj7MA4D1zCF39lh@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 10:25:52 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Brad Larson <brad@...sando.io>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] arm64: dts: Add Pensando Elba SoC support
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 03:53:13PM -0700, Brad Larson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 2:17 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 06:51:56PM -0700, Brad Larson wrote:
> > > + timer {
> > > + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) |
> > > + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> > > + <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) |
> > > + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> > > + <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) |
> > > + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> > > + <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) |
> > > + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
> > > + };
> >
> > The GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE() stuff is meant for GICv2, but as below you
> > have GICv3, where this is not valid, so this should go.
> >
> > Also, beware that GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) means a single CPU, which
> > doesn't mak sense for the 16 CPUs you have.
> >
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. Elba SoC is a GICv3 implementation and looking
> at other device tree files we should be using this:
>
> timer {
> compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(16) |
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(16) |
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(16) |
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(16) |
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
> };
No; as above, you should *not* use GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE() at all for GICv3. i.e.
> timer {
> compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> <GIC_PPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> <GIC_PPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> <GIC_PPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> };
Please see the GICv3 binding documentation:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic-v3.yaml
... and note that it does not have the cpumask field as use by the binding for
prior generations of GIC:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.yaml
If you've seen other dts files using GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE() with GICv3, those
are incorrect, and need to be fixed.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists