linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 (RFC)] docs: discourage users from using bugzilla.kernel.org

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 08 Nov 2021 13:43:01 +0200
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Artem S. Tashkinov" <aros@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 (RFC)] docs: discourage users from using bugzilla.kernel.org

On Fri, 05 Nov 2021, "Artem S. Tashkinov" <aros@....com> wrote:
> Let me continue.
>
> Here's something which is really bad for bugzilla.kernel.org:
>
> People _continue_ to file bug reports for graphics drivers in Linux and
> we don't even have proper components for it, only
>
> Video (AGP) - What? AGP has been dead for a decade.
> Video (DRI - Non Intel)  - what? Isn't it an X.org's feature, not kernel's?
> Video (Other)
>
> This is a complete and total clusterjoy.

FWIW, for Intel graphics (i915) we don't want any bug reports at
bugzilla.kernel.org. We've migrated away more than five years ago. The
"Video (DRI - Intel)" component was closed for new bugs around that
time, the description points at freedesktop.org as does MAINTAINERS:

INTEL DRM DRIVERS (excluding Poulsbo, Moorestown and derivative chipsets)
B:	https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/wikis/How-to-file-i915-bugs


BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center