[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1636378987.yp4skjpgb1.astroid@bobo.none>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 23:43:31 +1000
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: restore flushing of NMI buffers on remote CPUs
after NMI backtraces
Excerpts from Petr Mladek's message of November 8, 2021 6:34 pm:
> On Sun 2021-11-07 14:51:16, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> printk from NMI context relies on irq work being raised on the local CPU
>> to print to console. This can be a problem if the NMI was raised by a
>> lockup detector to print lockup stack and regs, because the CPU may not
>> enable irqs (because it is locked up).
>>
>> Introduce printk_trigger_flush() that can be called another CPU to try
>> to get those messages to the console, call that where printk_safe_flush
>> was previously called.
>>
>> Fixes: 93d102f094be ("printk: remove safe buffers")
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>
> We should add also
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.15
>
> No need to resent the patch. I could add it when pushing.
>
> Plan: I am going to wait one or more days for a potential feedback
> and ack from John. Then I am going to push this into printk/linux.git.
That sounds good to me.
> IMHO, it makes sense to get this into 5.16-rc1 or rc2.
Agree.
Thanks,
Nick
> Thank you both a lot for nailing this down and for the fix.
>
> Best Regards,
> Petr
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists