[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877ddjxuo9.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 10:12:06 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<ziy@...dia.com>, <osalvador@...e.de>, <shy828301@...il.com>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: migrate: Add new node demotion strategy
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> writes:
> On 11/4/21 7:51 PM, Huang, Ying wrote:
>>> Let's also try to do it with the existing node_demotion[] data
>>> structure before we go adding more.
>> To avoid cache ping-pong, I guess some kind of per-CPU data structure
>> may be more suitable for interleaving among multiple nodes.
>
> It would probably be better to just find something that's more
> read-heavy. Like, instead of keeping a strict round-robin, just
> randomly select one of the notes to which you can round-robin.
>
> That will scale naturally without having to worry about caching or fancy
> per-cpu data structures.
Yes. That sounds good. And per-CPU data structure is used inside
random API too :-)
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists