[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYkzJ3+faVga2Tl3@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:24:39 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rohit Maheshwari <rohitm@...lsio.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Vinay Kumar Yadav <vinay.yadav@...lsio.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 00/42] notifiers: Return an error when callback is
already registered
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:17:03AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> What reason is there for moving the check into the callers? It seems
> like pointless churn. Why not add the error return code, change the
> WARN to pr_warn, and leave the callers as they are? Wouldn't that end
> up having exactly the same effect?
>
> For that matter, what sort of remedial action can a caller take if the
> return code is -EEXIST? Is there any point in forcing callers to check
> the return code if they can't do anything about it?
See my reply to Geert from just now:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/YYkyUEqcsOwQMb1S@zn.tnic
I guess I can add another indirection to notifier_chain_register() and
avoid touching all the call sites.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists