linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v17 14/15] s390/ap: notify drivers on config changed and scan complete callbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3466dbba-0a3e-5678-2b2b-90a16ea9ca86@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:27:31 -0500
From:   Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
        fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 14/15] s390/ap: notify drivers on config changed and
 scan complete callbacks



On 11/5/21 9:15 AM, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
> On 05.11.21 09:23, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
>> On 04.11.21 16:50, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>> On 11/4/21 8:06 AM, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
>>>> Tony as this is v17, if you may do jet another loop, I would pick the ap parts of your patch series and
>>>> apply them to the devel branch as separate patches.
>>> Are you suggesting I do this now, or when this is finally ready to go upstream?
>>>
>>>
>> I am suggesting picking all the ap related stuff into one patch and commit it to the devel branch now (well in the next days).
>> So the ap stuff is then prepared for your patches and it gives your patch series some relief.
> Of course I would do this if you agree to this procedure.

I am fine with it, it makes sense