[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYk5s5fDuub7eBqu@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:52:35 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Wells Lu 呂芳騰 <wells.lu@...plus.com>
Cc: Wells Lu <wellslutw@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: ethernet: Add driver for Sunplus SP7021
> The switch will not recognize type of packets, regardless BPDU, PTP or any other
> packets. If turning off source-address learning function, it works like an Ethernet
> plus a 2-port hub.
So without STP, there is no way to stop an loop, and a broadcast storm
taking down your network?
Looking at the TX descriptor, there are two bits:
[18]: force forward to port 0
[19]: force forward to port 1
When the switch is enabled, can these two bits be used?
In the RX descriptor there is:
pkt_sp:
000: from port0
001: from port1
110: soc0 loopback
101: soc1 loopback
Are these bits used when the switch is enabled?
0.31 port control 1 (port cntl1) blocking state seems to have what you
need for STP.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists