[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b27cd90-3174-01f5-359c-be0c2e094fc8@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:44:08 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Yauhen Kharuzhy <jekhor@...il.com>,
Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] extcon: intel-cht-wc: Add support for devices with
an USB-micro-B connector
Hi,
On 10/31/21 13:52, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 9:29 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> So far the extcon-intel-cht-wc code has only been tested on devices with
>> a Type-C connector with USB-PD, USB3 (superspeed) and DP-altmode support
>> through a FUSB302 Type-C controller.
>>
>> Some devices with the intel-cht-wc PMIC however come with an USB-micro-B
>> connector, or an USB-2 only Type-C connector without USB-PD.
>>
>> These device are identified by "intel,cht-wc-setup" = "bq25890,bq27520",
>> since there is no Type-C controller on these devices the extcon code must
>> control the Vbus 5V boost converter and the USB role switch depending on
>> the detected cable-type.
>
> ...
>
>> + if (ext->vbus_boost && ext->vbus_boost_enabled != enable) {
>> + if (enable)
>> + ret = regulator_enable(ext->vbus_boost);
>> + else
>> + ret = regulator_disable(ext->vbus_boost);
>
>> + if (ret == 0)
>> + ext->vbus_boost_enabled = enable;
>> + else
>> + dev_err(ext->dev, "Error updating Vbus boost regulator: %d\n", ret);
>
> if (ret)
> dev_err()
> else
> ...
>
> ?
When doing if-else branches around an error code I always put the success
handling in the if branch and have the else branch deal with the error
to me that feels as the most natural way to do it the error is the exception
and thus the "else"
>
>> + }
>
> ...
>
>
>> + /*
>> + * Classic micro USB-B setup, this requires controling
>
> controlling
Fixed for the next version.
Thanks & Regards,
Hans
>
>> + * the role-sw and vbus based on the id-pin.
>> + */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists