[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211108163536.07bd2282@sal.lan>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:35:47 +0000
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
To: Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Patrik Gfeller <patrik.gfeller@...il.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Aline Santana Cordeiro <alinesantanacordeiro@...il.com>,
Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>,
Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>,
Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/17] media: atomisp: pci: fix inverted error check for
ia_css_mipi_is_source_port_valid()
Em Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:25:52 +0900
Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com> escreveu:
> <removed Alan from Cc as the mail address not reachable>
>
> On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 18:14 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 12:00:29AM +0900, Tsuchiya Yuto wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 14:33 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 01:19:45AM +0900, Tsuchiya Yuto wrote:
> > > > > The function ia_css_mipi_is_source_port_valid() returns true if the port
> > > > > is valid. So, we can't use the existing err variable as is.
> > > > >
> > > > > To fix this issue while reusing that variable, invert the return value
> > > > > when assigning it to the variable.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 3c0538fbad9f ("media: atomisp: get rid of most checks for ISP2401 version")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > .../staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_mipi.c | 24 ++++++++++++-------
> > > > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_mipi.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_mipi.c
> > > > > index 65fc93c5d56b..c1f2f6151c5f 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_mipi.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_mipi.c
> > > > > @@ -423,10 +423,12 @@ allocate_mipi_frames(struct ia_css_pipe *pipe,
> > > > > return 0; /* AM TODO: Check */
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (!IS_ISP2401)
> > > > > + if (!IS_ISP2401) {
> > > > > port = (unsigned int)pipe->stream->config.source.port.port;
> > > > > - else
> > > > > - err = ia_css_mipi_is_source_port_valid(pipe, &port);
> > > > > + } else {
> > > > > + /* Returns true if port is valid. So, invert it */
> > > > > + err = !ia_css_mipi_is_source_port_valid(pipe, &port);
> > > >
> > > > Don't invert it... This isn't supposed to return 1 on failure it's
> > > > supposed to return negative error codes.
> > >
> > > You mean I should instead modify the return value of
> > > ia_css_mipi_is_source_port_valid() ?
> > >
> >
> > No. ia_css_mipi_is_source_port_valid() is fine. It has a boolean name
> > so returning bool is fine. What I'm saying is that allocate_mipi_frames()
> > should do:
> >
> > if (!ia_css_mipi_is_source_port_valid(pipe, &port))
> > err = -EINVAL;
> >
> > Otherwise it returns negative error codes and 1 on failure.
>
> Ah, I see! Thank you. I feel I'm a stupid... I'll do so in v2.
I would prefer if you could send such changes on new patches.
Regards,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists