linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/13] dt-bindings: soc/microchip: update sys ctrlr compat string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9067328e-6ed7-5ad0-a518-4d3d5b875087@microchip.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:20:53 +0000
From:   <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC:     <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <palmer@...belt.com>,
        <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
        <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <Lewis.Hanly@...rochip.com>,
        <Daire.McNamara@...rochip.com>, <atish.patra@....com>,
        <Ivan.Griffin@...rochip.com>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>, <bin.meng@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] dt-bindings: soc/microchip: update sys ctrlr compat
 string

On 09/11/2021 08:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Hi Conor,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 4:06 PM <conor.dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Update 'compatible' strings for system controller drivers to the
>> approved Microchip name.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/microchip,polarfire-soc-mailbox.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/microchip,polarfire-soc-mailbox.yaml
>> @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ maintainers:
>>
>>   properties:
>>     compatible:
>> -    const: microchip,polarfire-soc-mailbox
>> +    enum:
>> +      - microchip,polarfire-soc-mailbox
>> +      - microchip,mpfs-mailbox
> 
> Is there any point in keeping the old compatible value?
> Are there any real users? Most of the MPFS upstream DT is still in flux.
yeah, true. and now is as good a time as any to just outright change it.
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                          Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                  -- Linus Torvalds
>