[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXEW72y1p-qR+X6EBqM8Rf5+fZnEs2WSSz7b+eU=zvPt6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:54:23 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/7] static_call: use helper to access non-exported key
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 19:53, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 05:45:45PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > @@ -196,13 +190,21 @@ extern long __static_call_return0(void);
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(STATIC_CALL_KEY(name)); \
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(name))
> >
> > +#define EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_GETKEY_HELPER(name) \
> > + struct static_call_key *STATIC_CALL_GETKEY(name)(void) { \
> > + BUG_ON(!core_kernel_text( \
> > + (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0))); \
> > + return &STATIC_CALL_KEY(name); \
> > + } \
> > + EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(STATIC_CALL_GETKEY(name))
>
> So if I were a nevarious module, I would look up the above symbol from
> kallsyms (it is exported and easily obtainable) and then simply
> read the text to discover the key address and we're in business.
>
Yeah I realised that. So would you prefer to have a
.static_call_tramp_key section in each module and look up the keys in
the module loader?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists